DOES ENERGY PAY FOR ITSELF?
I think, in most cases, it does but I can not prove it. It just seems logical to me that it will

Red Bull, other energy drinks, Starbucks etc.:
*are inconvenient. You have to go get them or carry them with you.
*they are considerably more expensive.
*most people use 2, 3, 4, or 5 of each of them every day.
*they contain sugar, calories, and many other things you don't want. Read the labels.

ENERGY PLUS AND ENERGY LITE:
*are convenient. You only need one tablet a day.
*they are considerably cheaper than energy drinks.
*they contain no sugar and no calories.
*they are ephedra free and only use natural herbs.

There is no question in my mind that it pays for some of itself and probably if one considers everything they much more than pays for themselves.

They suppress your appetite common increase your metabolism, and therefore you have weight loss. You get weight loss from eating less. That means you save money on food.

We went out to eat today. One of the people using ENERGY only ate half of what she was served. She took home the rest. That, obviously, is a money saving thing.

At home she eats less then before using ENERGY. It seems to me this must save more than the cost of a bottle of formula over the course of the month.

Most people say decreased weight increases health and decreases medical problems. I do not know of any way to calculate the savings from that for any individual but it must be a substantial amount.

In answer to the initial question I would give in emphatic, "yes" to anyone asking if the product pays for itself.

I am reasonably sure we can not claim that but we can certainly put it out as an exercise in logic.
Bob